MyCam.tv which was just sold for $1250, has been flipped again for $45,000. While these things happen with .com its not everyday for .tv. You can read the coverage of the sale at www.allthings.tv
About Raymond Hackney
Comments
Domain Investing Stats and Tips
Great sale.
Whole thing sounds made up, neither sale verified by dnjournal yet supposedly both buyer and seller keen to talk about the price.
What is the chance of a poor quality .tv (it is not even close to being a good name) selling for $1250 and $45,000 a couple of weeks apart?
I challenge “buyer” and “seller” to get this verified & prove that this sale took place. Remember England.tv? Will domainers be fooled again?
Let me ask you this mate ? Who the fuck are you to question anything you wanker.
Let me ask you this mate ? Who the fuck are you to question anything you wanker.
/////////////
Benny here is the key facts as far as I can see,
-Neither the $1250 sale nor the $45,000 sale has been verified. The sales are being claimed on the basis of a couple of emails.
-The buyer and seller don’t want to submit this to dnjournal but are happy to tell people about the sale.
-Most people would consider this name to be worthless yet we are to believe that it sold twice, firstly for $1250, then a couple of weeks after for $45,000. This is all for a name registered 3 months ago which is currently under proxy whois.
Without actual proof of a sale people are being taken for a ride once again. This has now happened multiple times with this extension. It is a captive audience and people want to believe these sales no matter how far fetched.
http://www.namepros.com/dot-tv/623145-england-tv-ends-in-drop-disapointment.html
The first sale was verified, Peeters1 came and said he sold the domain for $1250. The second sale,was posted by Ammar who has no problems with credibility. Ron Jackson is a great guy but DN Journal is not the end all be all, especially for those in Europe.
The first sale was verified, Peeters1 came and said he sold the domain for $1250. The second sale,was posted by Ammar who has no problems with credibility. Ron Jackson is a great guy but DN Journal is not the end all be all, especially for those in Europe.
//////////////
Someone claiming they sold something is not verification.
Its all we need Ammar is trusted in the .tv world,the same way Raymond is and in .tv they both rank much higher than Ron Jackson. So if Ammar said it sold, it sold.
James,
This is what he stated,
“I have been informed by the new owner and the party representing the new owner that MyCam.tv has exchanged hands for the sum of $45,000!”
That isn’t verification, isn’t whether you trust Ammar, it is whether you trust the person who claims to have sold it.